<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1490 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the Assessee, deleting the additions made under Section 68 and the penalty imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of Sections 68 and 269SS were not applicable to the facts of the case, particularly in the context of transactions between husband and wife. The judgment was pronounced on 27-11-2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1490 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the Assessee, deleting the additions made under Section 68 and the penalty imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of Sections 68 and 269SS were not applicable to the facts of the case, particularly in the context of transactions between husband and wife. The judgment was pronounced on 27-11-2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>