<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1489 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371146</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of both assessees, concluding that the transactions were genuine and the benefit of LTCG under Section 10(38) should be given. The additions made by the AO under Section 69A were deleted, as there was no material evidence to prove the transactions were bogus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1489 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371146</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of both assessees, concluding that the transactions were genuine and the benefit of LTCG under Section 10(38) should be given. The additions made by the AO under Section 69A were deleted, as there was no material evidence to prove the transactions were bogus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>