<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15454</link>
    <description>Storage tanks are treated as plant or machinery for extra-shift allowance purposes, and the exclusion in the depreciation rules applies only to storage tanks of mineral oil concerns; on that footing, molasses storage tanks owned by a sugar manufacturer qualify for the allowance. Amounts collected under a regulatory scheme for construction of molasses storage tanks were also examined under the overriding title doctrine: the text explains that such collections are not excluded from income merely because they are earmarked for statutory expenditure, although the governing precedent applied the result in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:33:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15454</link>
      <description>Storage tanks are treated as plant or machinery for extra-shift allowance purposes, and the exclusion in the depreciation rules applies only to storage tanks of mineral oil concerns; on that footing, molasses storage tanks owned by a sugar manufacturer qualify for the allowance. Amounts collected under a regulatory scheme for construction of molasses storage tanks were also examined under the overriding title doctrine: the text explains that such collections are not excluded from income merely because they are earmarked for statutory expenditure, although the governing precedent applied the result in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>