<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1479 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371136</link>
    <description>The Court held that the witness summoned under Section 108 of the Customs Act cannot seek exemption solely based on job security concerns. It emphasized the investigating officer&#039;s discretion to require physical presence when necessary for the inquiry&#039;s progress. Safeguards were ordered to prevent abuse, including videotaping the examination process. The Court addressed the witness&#039;s fears by allowing legal remedies and monitoring through closed-circuit cameras. Ultimately, the petition was disposed of, mandating the witness&#039;s appearance while ensuring a fair examination process and protecting against mistreatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1479 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371136</link>
      <description>The Court held that the witness summoned under Section 108 of the Customs Act cannot seek exemption solely based on job security concerns. It emphasized the investigating officer&#039;s discretion to require physical presence when necessary for the inquiry&#039;s progress. Safeguards were ordered to prevent abuse, including videotaping the examination process. The Court addressed the witness&#039;s fears by allowing legal remedies and monitoring through closed-circuit cameras. Ultimately, the petition was disposed of, mandating the witness&#039;s appearance while ensuring a fair examination process and protecting against mistreatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>