<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1478 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371135</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision rejecting the refund claim. The court emphasized that the authorities must apply the law correctly and cannot allow a refund application to challenge an assessment order that was not appealed. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was allowed, and the court reiterated the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgments in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1478 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371135</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision rejecting the refund claim. The court emphasized that the authorities must apply the law correctly and cannot allow a refund application to challenge an assessment order that was not appealed. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was allowed, and the court reiterated the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgments in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>