<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1474 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371131</link>
    <description>Service tax liability on chit-fund business was held not to arise for the period before 14.05.2015, the Court following the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Margadarshi Chit Funds (P) Ltd. and a Division Bench ruling of the High Court. The impugned demand was interfered with and set aside to that extent. For the period from 14.05.2015 onwards, the authorities were left free to examine the matter in accordance with the cited decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:56:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1474 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371131</link>
      <description>Service tax liability on chit-fund business was held not to arise for the period before 14.05.2015, the Court following the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Margadarshi Chit Funds (P) Ltd. and a Division Bench ruling of the High Court. The impugned demand was interfered with and set aside to that extent. For the period from 14.05.2015 onwards, the authorities were left free to examine the matter in accordance with the cited decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>