<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1467 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that service tax demands under ECIS post-1.6.2007 were unsustainable for composite contracts, which should be classified under WCS. Denial of CENVAT credit on rent-a-cab services was deemed unjustified, granting the assessee entitlement to such credit. The impugned orders were set aside, with the assessee&#039;s appeals allowed and Revenue&#039;s appeals dismissed. Cross-objections by the assessee were disposed of, and a miscellaneous application by Revenue for a change of cause title was permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1467 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that service tax demands under ECIS post-1.6.2007 were unsustainable for composite contracts, which should be classified under WCS. Denial of CENVAT credit on rent-a-cab services was deemed unjustified, granting the assessee entitlement to such credit. The impugned orders were set aside, with the assessee&#039;s appeals allowed and Revenue&#039;s appeals dismissed. Cross-objections by the assessee were disposed of, and a miscellaneous application by Revenue for a change of cause title was permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>