<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1463 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371120</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on services used for authorised operations in a Special Economic Zone is admissible where the SEZ Approval Committee has certified those services as required for the unit&#039;s operations. Notification No. 09/2009-ST exempts taxable services received by an SEZ developer or unit in relation to authorised operations, and the revenue cannot reject refund by independently reappraising nexus once the competent committee has approved the services. Services used for business activities incidental to manufacture and export in the SEZ were covered, so a narrow view that only manufacture qualified was unsustainable. The refund denial was accordingly set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1463 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371120</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on services used for authorised operations in a Special Economic Zone is admissible where the SEZ Approval Committee has certified those services as required for the unit&#039;s operations. Notification No. 09/2009-ST exempts taxable services received by an SEZ developer or unit in relation to authorised operations, and the revenue cannot reject refund by independently reappraising nexus once the competent committee has approved the services. Services used for business activities incidental to manufacture and export in the SEZ were covered, so a narrow view that only manufacture qualified was unsustainable. The refund denial was accordingly set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>