<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1463 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371120</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals and set aside the rejection of refund claims for services used in SEZ authorized operations. It emphasized the nexus certification by the Approval Committee and the eligibility for refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal found the first appellate authority&#039;s reasons illogical and contrary to the law, granting full consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1463 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371120</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals and set aside the rejection of refund claims for services used in SEZ authorized operations. It emphasized the nexus certification by the Approval Committee and the eligibility for refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal found the first appellate authority&#039;s reasons illogical and contrary to the law, granting full consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>