https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371114 The court dismissed the appeal, citing the settled legal position established in a prior judgment regarding the classification of structural steel items as inputs for availing CENVAT Credit. The court determined that there was no need to remit the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, as the core issue had already been conclusively addressed in the previous case. The dismissal was based on the alignment of the current appeal with the legal principles established in the earlier judgment, leading to the decision that the appeal did not warrant further consideration or remittance. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371114 The court dismissed the appeal, citing the settled legal position established in a prior judgment regarding the classification of structural steel items as inputs for availing CENVAT Credit. The court determined that there was no need to remit the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, as the core issue had already been conclusively addressed in the previous case. The dismissal was based on the alignment of the current appeal with the legal principles established in the earlier judgment, leading to the decision that the appeal did not warrant further consideration or remittance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371114