https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371113 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the remission application for destruction of goods and duty remission by the Adjudicating Authority. It found that the appellant, facing an injunction on the brand name "Manikchand," had legitimate reasons for their actions and that the Authority had overstepped its jurisdiction in alleging malafide intention and suggesting repackaging. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's right to seek destruction of goods and remission of duty under the Central Excise Rules, remanding the matter for reconsideration in line with the law due to the goods being unsuitable for marketing under the brand name injunction. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371113 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the remission application for destruction of goods and duty remission by the Adjudicating Authority. It found that the appellant, facing an injunction on the brand name "Manikchand," had legitimate reasons for their actions and that the Authority had overstepped its jurisdiction in alleging malafide intention and suggesting repackaging. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's right to seek destruction of goods and remission of duty under the Central Excise Rules, remanding the matter for reconsideration in line with the law due to the goods being unsuitable for marketing under the brand name injunction. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371113