<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Confirms Service Tax Demand Only for Normal Limitation Period in Plain Glass Supply Case; No Suppression Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42964</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - customers who supplied plain glass was believed in good faith to be a service and accordingly, service tax was paid under Business Auxiliary Services - no suppression of facts - demand confirmed only for the normal period of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Confirms Service Tax Demand Only for Normal Limitation Period in Plain Glass Supply Case; No Suppression Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42964</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - customers who supplied plain glass was believed in good faith to be a service and accordingly, service tax was paid under Business Auxiliary Services - no suppression of facts - demand confirmed only for the normal period of limitation.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>