<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1450 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the extended period of limitation was not justified as there was no intention to evade duty. The penalty was deleted, and interest was only applicable for the normal period. The judgment was pronounced on 16.11.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:55:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1450 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the extended period of limitation was not justified as there was no intention to evade duty. The penalty was deleted, and interest was only applicable for the normal period. The judgment was pronounced on 16.11.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>