<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1443 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the Appellant in accordance with the law. The issue of reversal of Cenvat credit on input services under Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was central to the case, where the Tribunal concluded that the credit availed on input services did not need to be reversed when inputs were removed from the factory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1443 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the Appellant in accordance with the law. The issue of reversal of Cenvat credit on input services under Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was central to the case, where the Tribunal concluded that the credit availed on input services did not need to be reversed when inputs were removed from the factory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>