<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15444</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of commission claimed by the assessee, emphasizing the legitimacy of the payments made to the Kanakia family members based on the joint agency agreement, evidence of services rendered, and commercial expediency. The Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15444</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of commission claimed by the assessee, emphasizing the legitimacy of the payments made to the Kanakia family members based on the joint agency agreement, evidence of services rendered, and commercial expediency. The Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>