<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (8) TMI 27 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277194</link>
    <description>Whether assessees formed an association of persons turned on the totality of joint conduct rather than mere inheritance of divisible shares. The article explains the court&#039;s reasoning that prolonged joint management - including leases and receipts in joint names, joint collection and accounting in a common zamindari cash book, appropriation from a common fund contrary to notional shares, and prior returns treating the parties as an association - supported treating them as an association of persons under section 3; contrasting authorities that deny association where only ownership or a common agent exists. It also notes that possession of definite shares or section 9(3) analysis is not conclusive; inference from cumulative facts is decisive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (8) TMI 27 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277194</link>
      <description>Whether assessees formed an association of persons turned on the totality of joint conduct rather than mere inheritance of divisible shares. The article explains the court&#039;s reasoning that prolonged joint management - including leases and receipts in joint names, joint collection and accounting in a common zamindari cash book, appropriation from a common fund contrary to notional shares, and prior returns treating the parties as an association - supported treating them as an association of persons under section 3; contrasting authorities that deny association where only ownership or a common agent exists. It also notes that possession of definite shares or section 9(3) analysis is not conclusive; inference from cumulative facts is decisive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>