<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (2) TMI 76 - TRAVANCORE &amp; COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277190</link>
    <description>Payments by disciples received by a retired teacher of Vedanta were held to be taxable as income because the recipient&#039;s post-retirement teaching constituted his vocation or occupation, so such receipts did not qualify as casual or nonrecurring exemptions under the statutory casual-receipts exclusion. The income was treated as arising in the territorial state where the vocation was carried on (Travancore) because the activities generating the receipts occurred there and there was no evidence the earnings accrued outside the state. Both questions were answered against the assessee: taxable and arising in-state.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (2) TMI 76 - TRAVANCORE &amp; COCHIN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277190</link>
      <description>Payments by disciples received by a retired teacher of Vedanta were held to be taxable as income because the recipient&#039;s post-retirement teaching constituted his vocation or occupation, so such receipts did not qualify as casual or nonrecurring exemptions under the statutory casual-receipts exclusion. The income was treated as arising in the territorial state where the vocation was carried on (Travancore) because the activities generating the receipts occurred there and there was no evidence the earnings accrued outside the state. Both questions were answered against the assessee: taxable and arising in-state.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>