<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15437</link>
    <description>The court held that the respondent lacked the authority to demand documents already submitted and verified, ruling the notice invalid. The petitioner&#039;s argument against a &quot;fishing expedition&quot; was upheld, restricting the respondent from pursuing specific documents but allowing the enquiry to proceed for other items. The judgment stressed adherence to legal procedures and jurisdictional limits in reassessments under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the importance of respecting boundaries in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:46:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15437</link>
      <description>The court held that the respondent lacked the authority to demand documents already submitted and verified, ruling the notice invalid. The petitioner&#039;s argument against a &quot;fishing expedition&quot; was upheld, restricting the respondent from pursuing specific documents but allowing the enquiry to proceed for other items. The judgment stressed adherence to legal procedures and jurisdictional limits in reassessments under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the importance of respecting boundaries in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>