https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371064 The court concluded that CUPGL is considered a 'State' under Article 12 but dismissed the writ petitions challenging the termination of employment. Despite finding the termination order not illegal, as employment terms were contractual and not governed by statutory provisions, the court denied the relief of reinstatement. The court emphasized that in cases of contractual employment, the usual remedy for wrongful termination is damages rather than reinstatement. Consequently, the court dismissed the petitions on the basis of lack of merit. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371064 The court concluded that CUPGL is considered a 'State' under Article 12 but dismissed the writ petitions challenging the termination of employment. Despite finding the termination order not illegal, as employment terms were contractual and not governed by statutory provisions, the court denied the relief of reinstatement. The court emphasized that in cases of contractual employment, the usual remedy for wrongful termination is damages rather than reinstatement. Consequently, the court dismissed the petitions on the basis of lack of merit. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371064