<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1397 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371054</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that Section 258 Cr.P.C. does not apply to proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act unless the cheque amount with interest and cost is paid. The court clarified that the principles of Section 258 Cr.P.C. as interpreted in a previous Supreme Court case only apply in specific circumstances where the accused compensates the complainant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:36:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1397 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371054</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that Section 258 Cr.P.C. does not apply to proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act unless the cheque amount with interest and cost is paid. The court clarified that the principles of Section 258 Cr.P.C. as interpreted in a previous Supreme Court case only apply in specific circumstances where the accused compensates the complainant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>