<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1397 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371054</link>
    <description>Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 does not apply to stop proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 where the cheque amount, interest and costs have not been paid. The court held that the stopping-of-proceedings principle recognised in the later Supreme Court decision is confined to the limited compensatory situation where payment has been made and the complainant stands compensated. It also stressed that precedent is binding only for its ratio decidendi and factual context. An attempt to invoke Section 258 on the basis of alleged absence of legally enforceable liability and a pending civil suit was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:36:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1397 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371054</link>
      <description>Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 does not apply to stop proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 where the cheque amount, interest and costs have not been paid. The court held that the stopping-of-proceedings principle recognised in the later Supreme Court decision is confined to the limited compensatory situation where payment has been made and the complainant stands compensated. It also stressed that precedent is binding only for its ratio decidendi and factual context. An attempt to invoke Section 258 on the basis of alleged absence of legally enforceable liability and a pending civil suit was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>