<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1392 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Service Tax on &quot;Business Auxiliary Services&quot; provided by the appellant but dropped the penalties imposed under Sections 68 and 78 of the Finance Act. The appeal was partly allowed based on the detailed analysis of the issues presented and the relevant legal precedents considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1392 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Service Tax on &quot;Business Auxiliary Services&quot; provided by the appellant but dropped the penalties imposed under Sections 68 and 78 of the Finance Act. The appeal was partly allowed based on the detailed analysis of the issues presented and the relevant legal precedents considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>