<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1388 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371045</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled that electricity charges reimbursed by tenants to the service provider should not be included in the gross value of renting of immovable property service. Citing legal precedents and lease agreements, it was established that such charges are the responsibility of tenants and do not form part of the service consideration. The tribunal set aside the initial order, allowing the appeal and stating that the demand for including electricity charges in the service tax calculation was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1388 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371045</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled that electricity charges reimbursed by tenants to the service provider should not be included in the gross value of renting of immovable property service. Citing legal precedents and lease agreements, it was established that such charges are the responsibility of tenants and do not form part of the service consideration. The tribunal set aside the initial order, allowing the appeal and stating that the demand for including electricity charges in the service tax calculation was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>