<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1383 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371040</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the inclusion of transaction charges in taxable value for service tax, holding that if charges passed on to clients formed part of the gross value, they were taxable. However, the tribunal allowed a remand for the issue of Cenvat credit, stating that if all requisite details were available on the unapproved documents, the credit could not be denied. The major demand in the order-in-original was upheld, but the denial of Cenvat credit was subject to further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1383 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371040</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the inclusion of transaction charges in taxable value for service tax, holding that if charges passed on to clients formed part of the gross value, they were taxable. However, the tribunal allowed a remand for the issue of Cenvat credit, stating that if all requisite details were available on the unapproved documents, the credit could not be denied. The major demand in the order-in-original was upheld, but the denial of Cenvat credit was subject to further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>