https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371040 Transaction charges recovered from clients in connection with stock broking services were included in the taxable value because they represented a statutory liability of the service provider and formed part of the gross amount charged, so the service tax demand on that count was upheld. By contrast, Cenvat credit could not be denied outright on the basis of unexamined documents where it was unclear whether the prescribed particulars were available; the credit dispute therefore required fresh verification and de novo adjudication, with the matter remanded on that issue. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371040 Transaction charges recovered from clients in connection with stock broking services were included in the taxable value because they represented a statutory liability of the service provider and formed part of the gross amount charged, so the service tax demand on that count was upheld. By contrast, Cenvat credit could not be denied outright on the basis of unexamined documents where it was unclear whether the prescribed particulars were available; the credit dispute therefore required fresh verification and de novo adjudication, with the matter remanded on that issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371040