<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1378 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371035</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on outward transportation of finished goods is available only up to the place of removal, so credit claimed beyond that limit was disallowed and the duty demand with interest was sustained. Where the dispute arose from interpretation of the statutory framework and divergent views existed, penalty was held unwarranted and was set aside. On the disputed quantum of demand, the matter was remanded for verification of the transport documents and recalculation in accordance with law. The result was partial success for the assessee: liability for duty and interest remained, penalty was annulled, and the amount of demand was sent back for factual scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1378 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371035</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on outward transportation of finished goods is available only up to the place of removal, so credit claimed beyond that limit was disallowed and the duty demand with interest was sustained. Where the dispute arose from interpretation of the statutory framework and divergent views existed, penalty was held unwarranted and was set aside. On the disputed quantum of demand, the matter was remanded for verification of the transport documents and recalculation in accordance with law. The result was partial success for the assessee: liability for duty and interest remained, penalty was annulled, and the amount of demand was sent back for factual scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>