<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 44 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15432</link>
    <description>The High Court emphasized the need to value closing stock at market rate on firm dissolution to determine income accurately. The court ruled that closing stock must be valued at market price to ascertain the firm&#039;s income up to the date of dissolution, in line with partnership deed provisions and legal precedents. The judgment favored the revenue, highlighting the significance of correct valuation of closing stock upon firm dissolution for precise income assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:34:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 44 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15432</link>
      <description>The High Court emphasized the need to value closing stock at market rate on firm dissolution to determine income accurately. The court ruled that closing stock must be valued at market price to ascertain the firm&#039;s income up to the date of dissolution, in line with partnership deed provisions and legal precedents. The judgment favored the revenue, highlighting the significance of correct valuation of closing stock upon firm dissolution for precise income assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>