https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371024 CENVAT credit was treated as admissible on capital goods used in a co-generation plant within factory premises, including TMT bars, rods and angles, because the plant was used for electricity generation and the dispute had already been settled by earlier decisions. The Tribunal followed precedents holding that such credit remains available even where the electricity generated is partly captively consumed and partly supplied to the electricity board. The controversy was considered no longer res integra, and the denial of credit was held unsustainable. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:35:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371024 CENVAT credit was treated as admissible on capital goods used in a co-generation plant within factory premises, including TMT bars, rods and angles, because the plant was used for electricity generation and the dispute had already been settled by earlier decisions. The Tribunal followed precedents holding that such credit remains available even where the electricity generated is partly captively consumed and partly supplied to the electricity board. The controversy was considered no longer res integra, and the denial of credit was held unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371024