<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1359 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371016</link>
    <description>Under Rule 14 of the Kerala Distillery &amp; Warehouse Rules, 1968, &quot;cost of establishment&quot; is limited to the establishment expenses expressly covered by the rule, namely pay, allowances, leave salary and pension contribution. Medical reimbursement under the Kerala Government Service Medical Attendant Rules, 1960 is a separate service benefit and cannot be recovered from the distillery merely because the officer was deputed there. A deputed Government servant remains in Government service, but the distillery&#039;s liability does not extend beyond the rule-based establishment costs. Recovery of the father&#039;s medical reimbursement was therefore impermissible, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1359 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371016</link>
      <description>Under Rule 14 of the Kerala Distillery &amp; Warehouse Rules, 1968, &quot;cost of establishment&quot; is limited to the establishment expenses expressly covered by the rule, namely pay, allowances, leave salary and pension contribution. Medical reimbursement under the Kerala Government Service Medical Attendant Rules, 1960 is a separate service benefit and cannot be recovered from the distillery merely because the officer was deputed there. A deputed Government servant remains in Government service, but the distillery&#039;s liability does not extend beyond the rule-based establishment costs. Recovery of the father&#039;s medical reimbursement was therefore impermissible, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>