<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1358 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371015</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the revision in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision rejecting the claim of interstate purchase of wheat on a commission basis for A.Y. 2004-05. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal erred in its assessment, directing a fresh decision without granting a new opportunity for evidence, stressing the importance of a prompt resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1358 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371015</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the revision in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision rejecting the claim of interstate purchase of wheat on a commission basis for A.Y. 2004-05. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal erred in its assessment, directing a fresh decision without granting a new opportunity for evidence, stressing the importance of a prompt resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>