<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1356 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371013</link>
    <description>Compounding of offences under the Kerala Value Added Tax framework prevents an assessee who voluntarily obtains compounding from contesting the factual basis of the related penalty proceedings, including inclusion of additional machines. Such factual objections may remain available in independent assessment proceedings where properly raised. Amendments enhancing the compounding fee must be read purposively across the relevant provision, including its proviso, rather than preserving an earlier lower ceiling. This construction avoids irrationally different fees for the same continuing offence based solely on the month of detection and gives full effect to the legislative enhancements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1356 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371013</link>
      <description>Compounding of offences under the Kerala Value Added Tax framework prevents an assessee who voluntarily obtains compounding from contesting the factual basis of the related penalty proceedings, including inclusion of additional machines. Such factual objections may remain available in independent assessment proceedings where properly raised. Amendments enhancing the compounding fee must be read purposively across the relevant provision, including its proviso, rather than preserving an earlier lower ceiling. This construction avoids irrationally different fees for the same continuing offence based solely on the month of detection and gives full effect to the legislative enhancements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>