<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1355 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371012</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the challenge to proceedings under Section 67 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, based on the expiration of the limitation period. It was held that the limitation period for such proceedings should be five years, commencing from the detection of the offense against the selling dealer. The delay in issuing notices to alleged purchasers did not impact the limitation period, as the proceedings were concluded within a reasonable time frame. The petitioners were directed to avail themselves of the statutory remedy by filing appeals within 30 days from the judgment date, with the possibility of stay applications for recovery actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1355 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371012</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the challenge to proceedings under Section 67 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, based on the expiration of the limitation period. It was held that the limitation period for such proceedings should be five years, commencing from the detection of the offense against the selling dealer. The delay in issuing notices to alleged purchasers did not impact the limitation period, as the proceedings were concluded within a reasonable time frame. The petitioners were directed to avail themselves of the statutory remedy by filing appeals within 30 days from the judgment date, with the possibility of stay applications for recovery actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>