<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1136 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The appellant&#039;s non-disclosure of income was considered as bonafide mistakes due to factors such as Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd.&#039;s failure to deduct TDS and clerical errors. The errors were deemed unintentional, leading to the conclusion that the discrepancies in income disclosure were not deliberate attempts to evade taxes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 06:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1136 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The appellant&#039;s non-disclosure of income was considered as bonafide mistakes due to factors such as Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd.&#039;s failure to deduct TDS and clerical errors. The errors were deemed unintentional, leading to the conclusion that the discrepancies in income disclosure were not deliberate attempts to evade taxes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>