<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1589 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277180</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the loss of Rs. 2.64 crores on bullion trading for Assessment Year 2008-09 was a normal business loss, not speculative, based on evidence of actual delivery of gold, as supported by parties involved and delivery notes. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this treatment was dismissed without costs, as the court found the issue not substantial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 06:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1589 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277180</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the loss of Rs. 2.64 crores on bullion trading for Assessment Year 2008-09 was a normal business loss, not speculative, based on evidence of actual delivery of gold, as supported by parties involved and delivery notes. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this treatment was dismissed without costs, as the court found the issue not substantial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>