<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (4) TMI 22 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277173</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the sum of Rs. 2,50,000 received by the assessee as damages for the premature termination of a contract was a capital receipt and not assessable as income under the Indian Income-tax Act. Therefore, the sum was not liable to excess profits tax, and the second question regarding the application of Rule 9 of Schedule 1 of the Excess Profits Tax Act became irrelevant. The assessee prevailed in the case, with costs awarded in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (4) TMI 22 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277173</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the sum of Rs. 2,50,000 received by the assessee as damages for the premature termination of a contract was a capital receipt and not assessable as income under the Indian Income-tax Act. Therefore, the sum was not liable to excess profits tax, and the second question regarding the application of Rule 9 of Schedule 1 of the Excess Profits Tax Act became irrelevant. The assessee prevailed in the case, with costs awarded in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>