<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (1) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277172</link>
    <description>Whether income of a trust not applied to a hospital and dispensary qualified for exemption under Section 4(3) was decided by applying the charitable purpose test and the public benefit requirement; the deed was parsed and the hospital/dispensary treated as public charitable purposes but temple worship, feeding and related provisions were found to be private religious objects due to settlor&#039;s reserved control, exclusionary clauses and absence of public beneficial interest or access. The court held that income not applied to the hospital and dispensary did not satisfy Section 4(3) and therefore was not exempt for the year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (1) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277172</link>
      <description>Whether income of a trust not applied to a hospital and dispensary qualified for exemption under Section 4(3) was decided by applying the charitable purpose test and the public benefit requirement; the deed was parsed and the hospital/dispensary treated as public charitable purposes but temple worship, feeding and related provisions were found to be private religious objects due to settlor&#039;s reserved control, exclusionary clauses and absence of public beneficial interest or access. The court held that income not applied to the hospital and dispensary did not satisfy Section 4(3) and therefore was not exempt for the year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>