https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277171 A challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is confined to the grounds expressly provided in that provision. Questions of stamping and registration do not arise for decision at the setting-aside stage, because objections to admissibility on those grounds become relevant when enforcement is sought under Section 36. The court therefore held that determining non-stamping and non-registration in Section 34 proceedings is premature and unnecessary, and that such objection may be raised at the enforcement stage. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277171 A challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is confined to the grounds expressly provided in that provision. Questions of stamping and registration do not arise for decision at the setting-aside stage, because objections to admissibility on those grounds become relevant when enforcement is sought under Section 36. The court therefore held that determining non-stamping and non-registration in Section 34 proceedings is premature and unnecessary, and that such objection may be raised at the enforcement stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277171