<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 682 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277171</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment due to premature consideration of stamp duty and registration requirements at the Section 34 stage. The Court clarified that stamping and registration issues should be addressed during the enforcement stage under Section 36. The matter was remitted for further consideration, granting parties the opportunity to raise objections regarding stamping and registration during the enforcement process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:11:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 682 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277171</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment due to premature consideration of stamp duty and registration requirements at the Section 34 stage. The Court clarified that stamping and registration issues should be addressed during the enforcement stage under Section 36. The matter was remitted for further consideration, granting parties the opportunity to raise objections regarding stamping and registration during the enforcement process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>