https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277168 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable to challenge termination of a Managing Director appointed under a company's Articles of Association, because the appointment and removal were governed by a non-statutory contractual arrangement. The termination was treated as simpliciter, without stigma, and no breach of a mandatory statutory provision or enforceable right to reinstatement was shown. The Court indicated that a remedy, if available, would lie in damages for wrongful dismissal rather than enforcement of a contract of personal service through writ jurisdiction. The separate opinion agreed that the petition disclosed no basis for relief on the pleaded grounds. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:44:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277168 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable to challenge termination of a Managing Director appointed under a company's Articles of Association, because the appointment and removal were governed by a non-statutory contractual arrangement. The termination was treated as simpliciter, without stigma, and no breach of a mandatory statutory provision or enforceable right to reinstatement was shown. The Court indicated that a remedy, if available, would lie in damages for wrongful dismissal rather than enforcement of a contract of personal service through writ jurisdiction. The separate opinion agreed that the petition disclosed no basis for relief on the pleaded grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277168