<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (4) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277164</link>
    <description>Whether the profit was income from an adventure in the nature of trade or a capital gain turned on a fact-specific multi factor inquiry; the court applied principles weighing intention to resell, absence of holding for investment, nature and use of the property, connection to business operations, and corroborative facts. Relevant factual findings included a benami purchase, piece meal acquisition of contiguous plots adjoining the mill, negligible income from the lands, no development activity, and evidence the purchaser acted to realise a sale to the mill. Those factors furnished sufficient material to treat the profit as taxable income from an adventure in the nature of trade, and the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was affirmed by the HC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:47:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (4) TMI 50 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277164</link>
      <description>Whether the profit was income from an adventure in the nature of trade or a capital gain turned on a fact-specific multi factor inquiry; the court applied principles weighing intention to resell, absence of holding for investment, nature and use of the property, connection to business operations, and corroborative facts. Relevant factual findings included a benami purchase, piece meal acquisition of contiguous plots adjoining the mill, negligible income from the lands, no development activity, and evidence the purchaser acted to realise a sale to the mill. Those factors furnished sufficient material to treat the profit as taxable income from an adventure in the nature of trade, and the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was affirmed by the HC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>