https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277156 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case involving the suspension and termination of services of the appellant, a Head Mistress of a school. The Court ruled that the appellant, as an employee of a private institution, was only entitled to damages, not reinstatement, based on the terms of the contract allowing termination with notice. The appellant was awarded three years' arrears of salary and an additional sum equivalent to three months' salary for damages. The Court also noted the appellant's failure to mitigate damages by seeking alternative employment but modified the judgment to provide further compensation. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:21:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277156 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case involving the suspension and termination of services of the appellant, a Head Mistress of a school. The Court ruled that the appellant, as an employee of a private institution, was only entitled to damages, not reinstatement, based on the terms of the contract allowing termination with notice. The appellant was awarded three years' arrears of salary and an additional sum equivalent to three months' salary for damages. The Court also noted the appellant's failure to mitigate damages by seeking alternative employment but modified the judgment to provide further compensation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277156