https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277146 A revisional order under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act was treated as supervisory rather than appellate, so a refusal to interfere did not merge with or supersede the Custodian's original order; the Custodian's order therefore remained the operative order for writ challenge. On tenancy rights, a terminated tenancy left only a statutory tenancy or personal right to occupy, which was not an occupancy right vesting in the Custodian under the Act. Because the occupant was in possession under colour of title and not a mere trespasser, summary eviction was not justified. The discussion states that the eviction order could not stand on that legal basis. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:04:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277146 A revisional order under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act was treated as supervisory rather than appellate, so a refusal to interfere did not merge with or supersede the Custodian's original order; the Custodian's order therefore remained the operative order for writ challenge. On tenancy rights, a terminated tenancy left only a statutory tenancy or personal right to occupy, which was not an occupancy right vesting in the Custodian under the Act. Because the occupant was in possession under colour of title and not a mere trespasser, summary eviction was not justified. The discussion states that the eviction order could not stand on that legal basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277146