<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 713 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete an addition/disallowance of Rs. 36,57,034/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act &#039;61. The Commissioner determined that payments made to 7 parties were for the purchase of equipment/machinery and not subject to tax deduction, citing CBDT guidelines and a High Court decision. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that the transactions were for material supplied as per specifications, in line with a Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court ruling. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 713 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete an addition/disallowance of Rs. 36,57,034/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act &#039;61. The Commissioner determined that payments made to 7 parties were for the purchase of equipment/machinery and not subject to tax deduction, citing CBDT guidelines and a High Court decision. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that the transactions were for material supplied as per specifications, in line with a Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court ruling. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>