<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 148 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277142</link>
    <description>The appellate court affirmed the trial judge&#039;s judgment, dismissing the plaintiff bank&#039;s suit for recovery of Rs. 5,200. The court found that the plaintiff bank was not negligent in encashing the forged cheque, the defendants acted in good faith, and equitable principles precluded recovery under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 148 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277142</link>
      <description>The appellate court affirmed the trial judge&#039;s judgment, dismissing the plaintiff bank&#039;s suit for recovery of Rs. 5,200. The court found that the plaintiff bank was not negligent in encashing the forged cheque, the defendants acted in good faith, and equitable principles precluded recovery under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>