<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1630 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain comparables and reworking the arithmetic mean. This exclusion would result in the price charged in the international transaction being at arm&#039;s length. The other grounds were not adjudicated as the exclusion of the comparables would suffice to resolve the issue. The judgment was pronounced on September 23, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1630 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain comparables and reworking the arithmetic mean. This exclusion would result in the price charged in the international transaction being at arm&#039;s length. The other grounds were not adjudicated as the exclusion of the comparables would suffice to resolve the issue. The judgment was pronounced on September 23, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>