<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1198 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order due to the lack of proper jurisdictional transfer procedures. The issues related to the addition of income under section 69C and the admissibility of additional evidence were not addressed in detail, as the jurisdictional transfer issue was deemed sufficient to dismiss the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1198 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order due to the lack of proper jurisdictional transfer procedures. The issues related to the addition of income under section 69C and the admissibility of additional evidence were not addressed in detail, as the jurisdictional transfer issue was deemed sufficient to dismiss the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>