https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277131 The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal held that the adjudication order should be considered received by the appellant on the date of communication. Since the appeal was filed within one month from receipt, there was no delay. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the appeal's merits after providing the appellant a personal hearing. The impugned order dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds was set aside. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:53:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277131 The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal held that the adjudication order should be considered received by the appellant on the date of communication. Since the appeal was filed within one month from receipt, there was no delay. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the appeal's merits after providing the appellant a personal hearing. The impugned order dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277131