<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1725 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues related to AMP expenses, selection of comparables, and classification of extraordinary expenses for fresh consideration by the TPO/AO in light of the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision. The appeals by both parties were allowed for statistical purposes, and the AO was instructed to grant the assessee ample opportunity before issuing a new order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1725 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues related to AMP expenses, selection of comparables, and classification of extraordinary expenses for fresh consideration by the TPO/AO in light of the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision. The appeals by both parties were allowed for statistical purposes, and the AO was instructed to grant the assessee ample opportunity before issuing a new order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>