<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1393 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277134</link>
    <description>Area based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE was available where manufacture had already commenced before the cutoff date, even though the assessee initially used a smaller tank because production requirements were limited. The later use of larger tanks as demand increased did not alter the fact that the unit had started production and was functioning for manufacturing activity. On that basis, the exemption was held available and the Department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1393 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277134</link>
      <description>Area based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE was available where manufacture had already commenced before the cutoff date, even though the assessee initially used a smaller tank because production requirements were limited. The later use of larger tanks as demand increased did not alter the fact that the unit had started production and was functioning for manufacturing activity. On that basis, the exemption was held available and the Department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>