<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1638 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277138</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that payments made by the Respondent Company to Marks &amp;amp; Spencer&#039;s PLC London were not subject to tax deduction at source. The Court agreed that the payments were reimbursement for salary expenditure of employees assisting in business operations, not fees for technical services under the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the service agreement and nature of services provided supported this conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found no legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s order, ending the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1638 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277138</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that payments made by the Respondent Company to Marks &amp;amp; Spencer&#039;s PLC London were not subject to tax deduction at source. The Court agreed that the payments were reimbursement for salary expenditure of employees assisting in business operations, not fees for technical services under the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the service agreement and nature of services provided supported this conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found no legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s order, ending the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>