<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15412</link>
    <description>A revised return filed only after departmental verification and confrontation with unexplained discrepancies did not establish a bona fide mistake, and the trial court&#039;s acquittal was found perverse. The record showed intentional concealment of cash purchase payments, false account entries, fabricated accounts, and false verification in the return, attracting liability for false evidence, use of false evidence, attempt to cheat, and wilful attempt to evade tax. The acquittal was reversed and conviction sustained on the charged counts. On sentence, the respondent&#039;s age, illness, and delay in proceedings justified modification to imprisonment till the rising of the court with fines maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15412</link>
      <description>A revised return filed only after departmental verification and confrontation with unexplained discrepancies did not establish a bona fide mistake, and the trial court&#039;s acquittal was found perverse. The record showed intentional concealment of cash purchase payments, false account entries, fabricated accounts, and false verification in the return, attracting liability for false evidence, use of false evidence, attempt to cheat, and wilful attempt to evade tax. The acquittal was reversed and conviction sustained on the charged counts. On sentence, the respondent&#039;s age, illness, and delay in proceedings justified modification to imprisonment till the rising of the court with fines maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>