<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1343 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371000</link>
    <description>The High Court initially rejected the appeals based on a previous judgment but reconsidered after a Supreme Court decision aligned with most High Courts. The subsequent Supreme Court judgment allowed the claim of the assessee, emphasizing the prospective application of Section 11(6) of the Income Tax Act from 2015-2016. As the assessment years were before this period, the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1343 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371000</link>
      <description>The High Court initially rejected the appeals based on a previous judgment but reconsidered after a Supreme Court decision aligned with most High Courts. The subsequent Supreme Court judgment allowed the claim of the assessee, emphasizing the prospective application of Section 11(6) of the Income Tax Act from 2015-2016. As the assessment years were before this period, the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>