<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1339 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370996</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the profit on the sale of shares should be classified as capital gain, the holding period for long-term capital gain was valid, the assessee&#039;s involvement in share transactions was that of an investor, and there was no evidence of tax evasion through bonus stripping. The Court emphasized that the assessee&#039;s actions aligned with legitimate tax planning practices, and the Revenue&#039;s objections were unfounded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=544093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1339 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370996</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the profit on the sale of shares should be classified as capital gain, the holding period for long-term capital gain was valid, the assessee&#039;s involvement in share transactions was that of an investor, and there was no evidence of tax evasion through bonus stripping. The Court emphasized that the assessee&#039;s actions aligned with legitimate tax planning practices, and the Revenue&#039;s objections were unfounded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>