https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370995 The Court acknowledged the delay in filing the appeal due to late receipt of the judgment copy by the petitioner, allowing the appeal to proceed. Concerns were raised over the non-consideration of the stay petition by the 4th respondent, leading to coercive measures by the Department. The Court directed the Tribunal to expedite the consideration of the stay application to prevent the appeal from being a mere formality. All coercive actions by the Department were halted until the stay application was reviewed, emphasizing the need for prompt resolution to ensure substantive consideration of the appeal. en-us Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:40:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370995 The Court acknowledged the delay in filing the appeal due to late receipt of the judgment copy by the petitioner, allowing the appeal to proceed. Concerns were raised over the non-consideration of the stay petition by the 4th respondent, leading to coercive measures by the Department. The Court directed the Tribunal to expedite the consideration of the stay application to prevent the appeal from being a mere formality. All coercive actions by the Department were halted until the stay application was reviewed, emphasizing the need for prompt resolution to ensure substantive consideration of the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370995